A Validation Study of Statement Validity Tests for Child Victims of Sexual Molestation

This study validated statement validity test tools such as CBCA, RM, and a contextual validity test of sexual molestation, used at ONE-STOP centers in South Korea. Furthermore, this study attempted to search for the cutoff scores of these instruments for judicial decision making. This study applied a simulation study with two criterion groups(Smith, 1997), a real sexually victimized group and feigned group. These 재 criterion groups were compared based on the scores of three dependent measures. Total scores of items were analysed, which were proven to have good item characteristics based on the study of Choi and Lee(2009). Total scores of three scales differentiated real sexual victims from feigned subjects. The most effective cutoff scores were found to be 13 of CBCA consisted of 11 items , 9 of RM consisted of 8 items, and 9 or 10 of a contextual validity test consisted of 14 items.

keywords: statement validity analysis, CBCA, RM, contextual validity test, ROC, differentiating power, 진술타당성분석, CBCA, RM, 성폭력발생맥락평가, ROC, 변별력

참고문헌

김현정 (2010). 성폭력피해아동의 진술분석 도구의 상대적 유용성 비교연구. 경기대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

박광배 (1995). 법심리학. 정민사.

송명자 (2008). 발달심리학. 학지사.

이수정 (2009). 아동피해자조사매뉴얼. 2009년도 진술분석전문가 교육 자료집. 경기대학교․여성부.

이수정 (2009). 아동 대상 성범죄 조사절차의 미비점 및 개선방안 연구: 진술타당성분석(Statement Validity Analysis)의 형사사법적 활용가능성, 한국경찰연구,8(3), 141-172.

조은경 (2004). 성폭력 피해 아동의 진술타당성 분석 및 활용방안에 관한 연구. 한국형사정책연구원.

최혜림, 이수정 (2009). 성폭력 피해 진술에 대한 신빙성 분석도구의 문항반응특성분석. 한국심리학회지: 여성, 14(4), 591-616.

Bourg, S., Connor, E., & Landis, E. (1995). The impact of expertise and sufficient information on psychologists' ability to detect malingering. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, pp.505-515

Boychuk, T. D. (1991). Criteria-based content analysis of children’'s statements about sexual abuse: A field-based validation study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.

10.

Boychuk, T. D., Esplin, P. W., & Raskin, D. C. (1988, June 18). Children's statements of sexual abuse: Validity of criteria-based content analysis. Presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy. Op. Cit. in M. Steller (1989), Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 135-154), NATO Advanced Science Institute Series, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

11.

Faller, K. C. (1991) Possible explanations for child sexual buse in divorce. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 61(1). 86-91.

12.

Faller, K. C. (2007). Interviewing children about sexual abuse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

13.

Fisher R., & Geiselman R. E. (1992), Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative onterviewing: The cognitive interview. Charles Thomas Publisher, U.S.A.

14.

Gardner, R. A. (1987). The parental alienation syndrome and the differentiation between fabricated and genuine child sex abuse. Creskill, NJ: Creative Therapeutics.

15.

Honts, C. R. (1994). Assessing children's credibility: Scientific and legal issues in 1994. North Dakota Law Review, 70, 879-903.

16.

Kapardis, A. (2006). Psychology and law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Johnson, M. K. and Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review. 88(1), 67-85.

18.

Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Hovav, M. (1997). Criterion-based content analysis: A field validation study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 21, 255-264.

19.

Loftus, E. F, & Davies, G. M. (1984). Distortions in the memory of children. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 52-67.

20.

Miller, H. A. (2001). M-FAST: Miller-forensic assessment of symptoms test professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

21.

Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Statement validity assessment: Interview procedures and content analysis of children's statements of sexual abuse. Behavior Assessment, 13, 265-291.

22.

Rogers, R. (1984). Towards an empirical model of malingering and deception. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 93-112.

23.

Rogers, R. (1997). Current status of clinical methods. In Richard Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed. pp.301-327). New York: Guilford.

24.

Smith, G. P. (1997). Assessment of malingering with self-report instruments. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.) (pp. 351-372). New York: Guilford.

25.

Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.

26.

Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). Hoe to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 19-36.

27.

Swets, J. A. (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293.

28.

Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell(ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Stockholm: P.A. Norsted and Sons.

29.

Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on credibility assessment in Maratea, Italy, June 1988.

30.

Vrij, A. (2004). Criterian-based content analysis: A Qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11(1), 3-41.

31.

Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3-41.

32.

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2002). Will the truth come out? The effect of deception, age, status, coaching, and social skills on CBCA scores. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 261–283.

33.

Yuille, J. C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children’'s testimony. Canadian Psychology, 29, 247 –262.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.24 No.2

아동 성폭력 피해 진술에 대한 신빙성 분석도구들의 타당도 연구

A Validation Study of Statement Validity Tests for Child Victims of Sexual Molestation

초록

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격