바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4

Citation Share

Do Liberals and Conservatives Use Different Moral Foundations: Their Schemas for Yong-san Tragedy

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.4, pp.93-105
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.006



& (2011). Do Liberals and Conservatives Use Different Moral Foundations: Their Schemas for Yong-san Tragedy. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25(4), 93-105, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.006

Abstract

Moral foundations theory(Haidt & Joseph, 2004) suggests that morality include authority/respect, ingoup/loyalty,purity/sanctity as well as harm/care and fairness/reciprocity and explains that there are disparities between liberals and conservatives among those moral foundations. The purpose of this study is aimed to explore that liberals and conservatives make decisions with different moral foundations on controversial social event, Yong-san tragedy. After conducting individual and group interviews, study 1 identified 14 concepts related with Yong-san tragedy(justice, unequal, harm, protect, safety, rights, brutal, obedience, order, illegal, control, development capital,left-wing, Yong-san tragedy). In Study 2, social network analysis reveals liberals possess larger and more complicated schema than conservatives. Moreover, whereas liberals’ schema included more concepts belonging to individualizing foundations(harm and fairness) than conservatives’ schema, conservatives’ schema included more concepts belonging to binding foundation(authority). Implications are discussed.

keywords
liberals and conservatives, moral foundations theory, Yong-san tragedy, social network analysis, 진보와 보수, 도덕적 기반이론, 용산재개발사건, 사회연결망분석

Reference

1.

김용학 (2007). 사회연결망 분석. 박영사.

2.

이미영 (2003). 인터넷 쇼핑 시장의 구조화에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

3.

이상신 (2009). 정치심리학의 연구 현황과 전망. 서울대학교 사회과학연구원 2009년 학술대회 발표논문집, 34-51.

4.

이선아 (2009). 감성적 인터페이스 디자인을 위한 스토리텔링: 스키마 부합도를 중심으로. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

5.

정은경, 손영우 (2011). 진보와 보수의 도덕적 가치 판단의 차이: 간통죄를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30(3), 727-741.

6.

황신웅 (2005). 모바일 기기 구매 의사결정에 관한 멘탈 모델의 추출. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

7.

Burt, R. S.(1982). Toward a Structural Theory ofAction: Network Models of Social StructureAction.. Academy Press.

8.

Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., & Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1986). Recall and measures of memoryorganization. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,12, 538-549.

9.

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009).Liberals and Conservatives Rely on DifferentSets of Moral Foundations. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029-1046.

10.

Gutmann, A. (2001). Liberalism. In Smelser N.J., andBaltes P.B. (Eds), International Encyclopedia ofthe Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York;Elsevier.

11.

Haidt, J. (2008). Morality. Perspectives onPsychological Science, 3, 65-72.

12.

Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009).Conservatives are more easily disgusted thanliberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714-725.

13.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology.American Psychologist, 61, 651-670.

14.

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., &Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism asmotivated social cognition. PsychologicalBulletin, 129, 339-375.

15.

Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008).Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality,and political psychology. Perspectives onPsychological Science, 3, 126-136.

16.

Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moralstages: A current formulation and a response tocritics. Basel: Karger.

17.

Levine, C. G. (1979). Stage acquisition and stageuse: An appraisal of stage displacementexplanations of variation in moral reasoning.Human Development, 22, 117-132.

18.

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social Consequences ofExperiential Openness. Psychological Bulletin,122, 323-337.

19.

Mizruchi, M. S.(1992). The Stucture of CorporatePolitical Action. Harvard University Press.

20.

Muller, J. Z. (1997). What is conservative social andpolitical thought? In J. Z. Muller (Ed),Conservatism: An anthology of social andpolitical thought from David Hume to thepresent. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress.

21.

Nucci, L.P., & Turiel, E. (1978). Social Interactionsand the Development of Social Concepts inPreschool Children. Child Development, 49,400-407.

22.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle,B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: Apersonality variable predicting social and politicalattitudes. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 67, 741-763.

23.

Rest, J.R. (1986). Moral development: Advances inresearch and theory. New York: Praeger Press.

24.

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of socialknowledge: morality and convention.. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

25.

Western, D. (2007). The political brain: The role ofemotion in deciding the fate of the nation. NewYork; Public Affairs.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy